Lynn, or who ever you are, Before you start taking a tone and spouting your mouth off about who has a clue or not, you should step back, compose yourself and be sure you understand what you had read. Nobody was stating anything offensive towards you other than to say these are not inexpensive engine builds you are talking about like the person who was originally asking the question was concerned about. If you read something else into what I said, that is not my problem. The whole point was how to save money and build a strong engine that will perform well not you can take this Chevy rod that costs $20 less and build an AMC engine while avoiding all the added costs to use that Chevy rod in your AMC engine. You save nothing when it comes to high performance parts whether it be for Chevy or AMC. Using a 6" Chevy rod is a great idea for a whole host of different combinations that many of use have done in the past but it is not the least expensive. It was also not stated to try and get people to buy the Scat rods because I have a vested interest in them. I could care less if you do. As of right now, I don't have any obligation to pay for any other sets beyond what I already received and all of them have already been spoken for. If you are tired of giving away your secrets as you stated (which I don't recall you posting so much of your ever so valuable information that no one else knows but you), than just delete the post and keep you hands quite. If you were just having a bad day or misread the post, then no problem, just say so and we will move on. Acting like you are the sole AMC guru while insulting others won't fly with me or most on this list that have been around long enough to know better. Sorry if this has wasted others on the list time. If this comes of a bit harsh, it was not meant to be anything other than responding to someone challenging my knowledge and falsely accusing me of having a hidden agenda. AMC does not make or break my life. In fact, it would be much easier on me to not be involved beyond my own personal use. Guess I am just a glutton for punishment. Nick Alfano Message-ID: <20050130202856.7847.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:28:56 -0800 (PST) From: lynn peterson <kustomkemps@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: GM Forged Rods on Turned 401 Cranks To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx You can't get down on me because you haven't got a clue. Everyone knows you have a vested interest in your rods and pistons, so goodie for you. Actually, it was nice of you to take your time to get some AMC parts made, but I can do just as well or better for the same or less money. How about a a 410 CID engine that uses 5.85" long 2.1" journal Scat rods ($350), 455 forged Pontiac pistons, .060 over (4.21" bore, which is only .045" over the stock bore.) with a 1.497 CH ($307). The crank is not offset ground, but is ground dowm to the SBC journal size. Not only do you get a lighter reciprocating mass, but there are better rod bearings available for the SBC rods than we can get for our AMC's. By the way, anyone who does not think the rotatiing mass of a 390/401 is a problem, just look at the Donahue NASCAR effort, and you will see they could not run the factory rods and crank, which was not competitive, and broke in any event. With all the oiling mods and machine work, this setup, in short block form, costs ~$1600 to build. If you read my post you will see it was ONE OF MANY EXAMPLES. Yes, it did cost $8,000 to build this particular engine, but it was a 10 hour road race DRY SUMPED enduro motor. We could have saved nearly $2,000 if we had not had to totally re- engineer the dry sump setup ourselves, which cost extra machine shop time. However, I have now tired of explaining myself and giving my information away for free. Therefore, ANYONE who might like information on how to build stroker motors, oiling systems, ect. send a SASE envelope along with a $10 postal money order to: Lynn Peterson c/o Kustom Kemps 6122 SW 36th Ave. Portland, Or. 97221