Re: 73 Javelin/ 360/ Auto / Pierre Cardin?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 73 Javelin/ 360/ Auto / Pierre Cardin?
- From: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:57:13 -0500
Hmmmm, light airplane fabric vs auto interior? Maybe a safety factor? Last I
knew I wouldn't fall that far if my car seat ripped. And don't we puncture
test are cars' interior all the time? i.e screwdriver or pen/pencil in back
pocket. By the way, you have bigger b*lls then most to fly in something that
barely goes 50 mph and is airborne. Kudos to you Joey.
p.s. Teach moved my seat to the front row 'cause I was bein' bad.
>Hey you, unsigned, yes you in the back of the >room.
>My reasoning is that if it is faded you know that >the
>sun has gotten to it and has at least degraded the
>dyes and has probably degraded the synthetic >fabric. I
>fly light airplanes and one thing that you must be
>careful with (involving a fabric covered plane) is >sun
>getting directly to the Dacron fabric. Fabric is
>punch tested periodically to see if it meets specs >or
>strength. Sunlight is the great enemy here.
>The headliner would possibly be worth something >to
>someone as a part of the interior if it is in good
>condition. Just my thoughts.
>Regards,
>Joe Fulton
>Salinas, CA
--- mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Forget the PC interior if it is faded, but what
> >about the headliner?
>
> Forget it? Why? The seats can easily be dyed to look
> pretty damn good. That
> headliner is real desirable without the interior.
> DUH !!
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin