Hmm... I've only seen one or two Gremlins with the solid rotors. I've only seen one Spirit with a 2.0L, and I didn't look at the brakes on it. I saw a Concord in a junkyard that had a 2.0L, but the brakes were missing on it. It's one of those parts book things! I don't have any of my books here with brake info. Apparently there was a change, maybe in 79 with the Spirit 2.0L -- that or the brakes were changed to a later style because the solid rotors were hard to find??? I know all the 2.5L fours use vented rotors, so a change is more likely. The calipers for the solid rotor brakes was the same as vented, they just had special pads. If someone with a late parts book would look that up, and the difference between 77-78 and 79-83 rotors it would be appreciated. I've a microfiche set, but not with me, and I don't have a reader yet! Haven't found anyone to put the fiche on CD-ROM either -- not for a price I could afford anyway. -- Frank Swygert Publisher, "American Independent Magazine" (AIM) For all AMC enthusiasts http://farna.home.att.net/AIM.html (free download available!) -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > Frank: we (Jeff, Jeff and I) have a 79 Spirit Limited parts car with the Audi > 4-cylinder, but it doesn't have solid rotors--it has regular vented rotors like > the 6-cylinder cars. > > Jeff Reeves > Auburn GA > 79 Spirit GT > 72 Javelin SST > 69 Ambassador DPL > > On January 15, 2005 Frank Swygert wrote: > > > Would someone check a parts book on the rotor issue here? I know about the > composite pistons. Finding a caliper with composite pistons is very unlikely > because of the failure rate. The pistons (or whole caliper) were replaced by AMC > on warranty in most cases, by the owner when they started leaking in others. If > a car had been driven much they would have been replaced within a couple years > at most. > > > > I believe the rotors are all the same from 77-83 except for the 77-79 four > cylinder models (2.0L), which used a solid rotor.